Theology Matters
Theology Matters
  • 7
  • 282 256
Hermeneutics: An Introduction
In this video Kyle defines hermeneutics and explains how it was picked up as a tool by theologians who sought to reconstruct a system of belief in light of many of the challenges of the Enlightenment.
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/channels/nhFs.html...
Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheologyMatters
Email: yestheologymatters@gmail.com
Facebook: TheologyComrade
Twitter: theologycomrade
Instagram: theology_co...
PayPal: paypal.me/TheologyMatters
Share this video: ua-cam.com/video/EHmDizqvNig/v-deo.html
Some of the links in the description are affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I will receive a small commission.
Recommended Resources:
Daniel L. Migliore, Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology, third ed. Grand Rapids: Wim. B. Publishing Co. Eerdmans, 2014. amzn.to/2E9fcqz (affiliate)
Peter C. Hodgson and Robert H. King, eds. Christian Theology: An Introduction to Its Traditions and Tasks. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1994. amzn.to/2FS6fA0 (affiliate)
Serene Jones and Paul Lakeland, eds. Constructive Theology: A Contemporary Approach to Classical Themes. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2005. amzn.to/2Ewlgap (affiliate)
William Placher, ed. Essentials of Christian Theology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2003. amzn.to/2DuJC6E (affiliate)
Jens Zimmermann on Hermeneutics: ua-cam.com/video/6wPTV5hyB0Y/v-deo.html
plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/hermeneutics/
Disclaimer:
All copyrighted material falls under the category of "fair use" for educational purposes and/or commentary. If you believe that we have misused your material, please contact us.
Music/Sound:
www.bensound.com
soundbible.com
Video:
www.videezy.com
Переглядів: 26 298

Відео

4 Theology Books to Read for Valentines Day!
Переглядів 1,7 тис.6 років тому
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/channels/nhFs.html... Share this video: ua-cam.com/video/XZ-wm3hQUL0/v-deo.html Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheologyMatters Email: yestheologymatters@gmail.com Facebook: TheologyComrade Twitter: theologycomrade Instagram: theology_comrade PayPal: paypal.me/TheologyMatters Some of the links in the description are affiliate links, which m...
Revelation/knowledge of God!
Переглядів 6 тис.6 років тому
In this video Kyle talks about the doctrine of revelation and how both the Reformation and the Enlightenment shifted the way that many theologians think about this doctrine today. Subscribe: ua-cam.com/channels/nhFs.html... Share this video: ua-cam.com/video/bHjDUL4h4TA/v-deo.html Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheologyMatters Email: yestheologymatters@gmail.com Facebook: TheologyComrade...
What in the World Is Process Theology?
Переглядів 44 тис.6 років тому
In this video Kyle helps to unpack what people mean when they talk about "Process Theology". Subscribe: ua-cam.com/channels/nhFs.html... Share this video: ua-cam.com/video/SlZlBhYgw14/v-deo.html Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheologyMatters Email: yestheologymatters@gmail.com Facebook: TheologyComrade Twitter: theologycomrade Instagram: theology_comrade PayPal...
The Task of Theology!
Переглядів 7 тис.6 років тому
In this video Kyle introduces the task of theology. Subscribe: ua-cam.com/channels/nhFsD8t_5iaRqaqxv7ss0w.html Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheologyMatters Email: yestheologymatters@gmail.com Facebook: TheologyComrade Twitter: theologycomrade Instagram: theology_comrade PayPal: paypal.me/TheologyMatters Share this video: ua-cam.com/video/HAXlLZmhZD4/v-deo.htm...
What is Theology?
Переглядів 192 тис.7 років тому
In this video, Kyle helps define what theology is, explains how it is all around us, and talks about why you should care about theology. Note: It should be "Evagrius of Pontus" not "Ponticus". I will also fix the subscribe animation in the next video. Subscribe: ua-cam.com/channels/nhFsD8t_5iaRqaqxv7ss0w.html Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheologyMatters Email: yestheologymatters@gmail.com Facebook:...
Welcome to Theology Matters | An Introduction
Переглядів 5 тис.7 років тому
Kyle Introduces Theology Matters, a UA-cam channel committed to bringing you all the theological goodness that you’ll need to challenge, interrogate, and reimagine what theology means to you Subscribe: ua-cam.com/channels/nhFsD8t_5iaRqaqxv7ss0w.html Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheologyMatters Email: yestheologymatters@gmail.com Facebook: TheologyComrade Twitter: theologyco...

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @vaudevillian7
    @vaudevillian7 20 днів тому

    Sounds very similar to Buddhism

  • @neil6477
    @neil6477 Місяць тому

    I can see why Process theology is a problem from a Christian perspective. You have to twist and turn to make God fit into how you see Him. But, if you simply drop your preconceptions, open up to viewing God in a more Eastern tradition then, instead of being something which is problematic, God becomes more real and becomes Existence itself. The problem for Christians is that you want an anthropomorphic God, full of feelings and desires. Drop this childish concept and realise that It is way beyond such simple ideas.

  • @CrownOfThornss
    @CrownOfThornss 3 місяці тому

    Thank you! This really helped me understand this whole hermeneutics shenanigans 😅

  • @KellyBell1
    @KellyBell1 3 місяці тому

    You’re a great speaker. Very clear, concise and did not put me to sleep. I’m still not completely 100% clear on what exactly “hermeneutics” is though. I mean,…it’s just the way we interpret something,..like scripture, for example? I’m sorry, your video is great…I’m just slow at grasping some things.🤷🏻‍♀️ Subscribed because I want to learn more!

  • @DESIRESTRINGS
    @DESIRESTRINGS 5 місяців тому

    Revelations to be Jesus, Christ centered the great commission of bringing people to Christ as Lord and Savior, and making disciples of all nations, and perceiving time is of the essence, and only using time for what is necessary. Revelation should be that the Christian mind is that of only the most important actions that the Christian should do.

  • @happydog2524
    @happydog2524 5 місяців тому

    garbage

  • @PortSpice-lc2cn
    @PortSpice-lc2cn 5 місяців тому

    I lost a second idea

  • @amigostvtx
    @amigostvtx 6 місяців тому

    This was great!!!

  • @staffy4389
    @staffy4389 6 місяців тому

    In other words, it's a word that means,,,,nothing,,,or opinions...

  • @AndrewErwin73
    @AndrewErwin73 6 місяців тому

    I am currently working on my doctorate in theology. My dissertation is based heavily on Charles Hartshorne. When you said that it is a tough subject, that is an understatement. This seems to be an especially difficult subject for Christians. When I was shopping my proposal, I got several letters from several schools using the word "heresy" several times each. I appreciate your intro here. You made it simple without oversimplifying the subject as a whole. Process Philosophy/Theology is anything but simple. Thanks for what you do. And thanks for this.

  • @ENOC772
    @ENOC772 7 місяців тому

    Process teology is so non dualistic, I love it, make so much sense

  • @charlesdavis7087
    @charlesdavis7087 7 місяців тому

    I think that you may have misunderstood Whitehead's notions about the meaning of "prehensions". Wrong. Yes, the present is influenced by the past... but not determined by it. God is "the fellow companion" upon the way. And therefore, even God is in the process of LEARNING through It's creation. This deep insight gives rise or may unfold into a world, a new... world... where each atom comes with new and deep... and abiding sense of the eventual rightness of all things. And this abiding sense gives to creation a sense of self-determination. Eventually, WE have to remember and learn thereby. The One Great ALL THERE IS, didn't make a few mistakes... here and over there; God made them all. Remember! Now we have to consider a larger circumference upon the nature of responsibility, immanence and concresense. (Sorry, I spelled the word wrong.) I am... a student of Alfred Korzybski, Fredrick Chopin and Count Dracula , Late of Transylvania. That means, I'm an idiot. And just in case you haven't noticed; you're a kid. With lots to learn. Congratulations!!!!!!

  • @BurningFlamesofDivineDragon
    @BurningFlamesofDivineDragon 7 місяців тому

    Great video this was clearly explained keep up the good work.

  • @Narnian77
    @Narnian77 9 місяців тому

    You have to throw out most of Scripture in order to adopt this philosophy. Process theologians have just created a god in their own image.

    • @user-hk9uz2py4p
      @user-hk9uz2py4p 6 місяців тому

      Respectfully, I disagree. I don’t think Scripture has to be thrown out to adopt process theology, rather you have to throw a literal/fundamentalist view of the Bible. The view actually helps move away from dogma and predestination.

  • @user-yp2zy9hx6y
    @user-yp2zy9hx6y 9 місяців тому

    Advice to everyone : Islam is the true religion

  • @ENOC772
    @ENOC772 9 місяців тому

    This looks like a process relational panentheism hipotesis, and it is like how the cosmos works according to our actual knowledge of nature and cosmology.

  • @clarkedavis488
    @clarkedavis488 11 місяців тому

    Thanks

  • @Nostravenom
    @Nostravenom 11 місяців тому

    Thank you creating these videos. They have truly made me understand the world better. And now I know how to break down anything and understand the interpretations that go on. Thank you

  • @homeslicekey500
    @homeslicekey500 11 місяців тому

    What do you mean by discourse?

  • @independencemp3
    @independencemp3 11 місяців тому

    Violence does not create, love does

  • @independencemp3
    @independencemp3 11 місяців тому

    prehension jazz, bounce

  • @user-kc5qy6lk4t
    @user-kc5qy6lk4t Рік тому

    Two. And doing your very favorite inside doy.

  • @magepunk2376
    @magepunk2376 Рік тому

    Process theology can get really complicated, but at its core, it’s far more intuitive than classical theology. It just makes more sense with the world as we know it.

  • @peepawsjorts
    @peepawsjorts Рік тому

    They don’t like to talk about it at length because cognitive dissonance kicks in…

  • @Chi_Loutman
    @Chi_Loutman Рік тому

    Sounds like process theology believes they can create their own morals, that they can be as gods. Where am I getting this wrong?

    • @careforjusticealways
      @careforjusticealways 8 місяців тому

      ? that’s not what he said. do u just listen to ur own logic or what..

    • @Chi_Loutman
      @Chi_Loutman 8 місяців тому

      @@careforjusticealways Did I make any Quote? Or did I make an inference and question my own logic? Are you searching for an excuse the argue with a stanger on the internet? Not every person who makes a comment is smug and righteously indignant. If your purpose is to gain a dopamine hit from a meaningless argument with a stranger, you will get none from me. If you actually want to engage in the topic in good faith, I'm here for it.

    • @careforjusticealways
      @careforjusticealways 8 місяців тому

      @@Chi_Loutman um based off the video it doesn’t seem like that’s what he said. it’s not argument it’s just asking , cus what ur saying doesn’t make sense

    • @Chi_Loutman
      @Chi_Loutman 8 місяців тому

      @@careforjusticealways Where does process theology derive their moral framework?

  • @tulliusagrippa5752
    @tulliusagrippa5752 Рік тому

    If what you say is true, then god is not god, and differs not a whit from us. Furthermore, you have not a shred of evidence for your views. In fact, yours is an useless thesis that makes not the blindest bit of difference to anything or anyone. It is as pointless as it is unfounded.

  • @leonramsay21
    @leonramsay21 Рік тому

    Good reasoning. Many who study theology believe they are called to preach.

  • @seanmoran2743
    @seanmoran2743 Рік тому

    America dominated you tube

  • @magepunk2376
    @magepunk2376 Рік тому

    Is this channel dead? No new uploads in five years. Hopefully the creator is okay. I’ll subscribe just in case he ever returns, there’s some good stuff here.

  • @bobbydigital8243
    @bobbydigital8243 Рік тому

    The study of theology, as it stands in Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authorities; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion. Not anything can be studied as a science, without our being in possession of the principles upon which it is founded; and as this is the case with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.

  • @roshanroy3544
    @roshanroy3544 Рік тому

    i enjoyed the background jazz more than the video

  • @fernandofierro7958
    @fernandofierro7958 Рік тому

    I love you 💗FATHER💛......

  • @davidrose3737
    @davidrose3737 Рік тому

    Good Video

  • @davidrose3737
    @davidrose3737 Рік тому

    It's the same as people complain about their state Governer or Premier. But they never go out and vote

  • @davidrose3737
    @davidrose3737 Рік тому

    The God of Obama is not the God of the Bible. His Bible is the Koran

  • @thelivingtribunal8494
    @thelivingtribunal8494 Рік тому

    It is an interesting thing, though I do not completely agree with it, much like I do not completely agree with the mechanistic view either. I think relationalism is important but ultimately essence is more fundamental than existence and relations. This is not to say I subscribe to the vinyl model of theology/B-theory of time model, I think its somewhere between the two- the essence comes first, then the relational/existence part comes in and pushes towards an outcome. In this, all possible things that can happen (an unimaginably broad range of possibility but exhaustive nonetheless) can be listed, all things that have happened can also be listed; but in the span of time, the things that have happened would only be a small subset of all things that could have happened in that duration, so most possibilities don't end up becoming even though they could have from a very broad but definite list and have some kind of 'being' on that list. I do not know how this happens, I suspect it is truly random and doesn't necessarily aid a notion of free will. On the other hand if one wanted to apply a notion of free will to this described system perhaps free will can tilt and alter the chances of what the outcomes will be. It can work either in the presence or absence of free will. At least that is my hunch.

  • @scrabblescars
    @scrabblescars Рік тому

    God sounds more like a muse

    • @buyvibe
      @buyvibe 2 місяці тому

      Yes, inspiring us to more unfolding beauty, goodness and truth

  • @EugenTemba
    @EugenTemba Рік тому

    God is not love, God is infinite strife.

  • @Anselmiankey
    @Anselmiankey Рік тому

    Good jazz improvisation is impossible without reliance upon static concepts and realities.

  • @sfopera
    @sfopera Рік тому

    How is this different from Buddhist interdependence, which implies a lack of substantiality?

  • @wesleythemime
    @wesleythemime Рік тому

    Well done.

  • @conniecarr1845
    @conniecarr1845 Рік тому

    Really enjoyed this succinct explanation that is so relatable. However, the background music made it very difficult for me to take it in and I would appreciate a way to remove the music from the settings.

  • @LOPGOH
    @LOPGOH Рік тому

    But I did screenshot it.

  • @LOPGOH
    @LOPGOH Рік тому

    🤔Hmmm. It's easy to comprehend why people have certain views. There's a lot of misinformation and propaganda. When people pick up certain books and study things they get branded or categorized into a certain section. Catholicism :Luciferianism, Satanism, AntiChristianity. 🤔Then people do a little history and realize Jesus Christ was stabbed with a Roman's spear. Still didn't die. More studying shows why. When you see a person with a Quran... some think he/she is Muslim/Islamist. Same happens with a Bible or a Torah. More research shows it's relative. Just in a different language. Sociology is a completely superficial science. In my opinion a waste of time. Because people change. Whether by realizing the truth. Or discernment of their history by fact. I studied demonology when I was a boy a right of passage. That's just on sliver of what's in the Bible. Then with language studies you realize some terms have root words and having a language barrier definitely complicates things. While studying the Bible there is also Angelology. Tribes of men and Women and their (Angle) interactions. Complementary to other things in history the biggest to remember is when someone figures out the truth... misinformation doesn't work. Theology is definitely in everything. The fact that God (Jesus) is mentioned in literally everything is important. The hammer comes down with one simple question after knowing history and there is so much. It's why people don't talk about religion and politics at the dinner table. Some are still reading and learning. And no I'm not a Catholic. But you have to read to know what is what, who is whom. The old saying... the oldest form of flattery. 🤔Exactly what Catholicism tries to do. Then words like convert come to mind when most of these subjects that complement each other are innate. That's what people miss. God is innate. Not the Church. That is why being called self righteous is a complement. Some thought it was an insult 🤣. Then you hear words like indifference. 🤔For example ✝ 🐺 🐑 ⚖ Christianity (Alpha and Omega) Ambivalence isn't indifference Catholicism 🐍 🧛‍♂️ 🍷 "Drink the blood of your savior and eat his body". 🤔 You have to read about principles and you can even tell how they literally improved over time. If you have ever Isaiah you see a huge difference in principles. Not drinking/selling alcohol, not drinking blood, not harming innocence. Mark, Mathew, Luke, Paul, John (Especially), Joshua, Pslams.... 🤔 Most people have a digital library of subjects. If you brand a person with a logo of all the subjects they know and that's all they know... 😬...some people are full of 💩. Given time... hopefully that's not the case. 🤔 Most people have a curriculum. They have to study everything. That's why you are not suppose to judge. Then people end up being Magistrates or Judges 🤨. Every kind of Law. 🤔 It's not boasting. You can be completely nonchalant about what you know and tell others why you are the way you are but unless they read the material they don't comprehend certain things. Or maybe it's a situation. Fact is you don't have to. 🤔 Either way... this isn't directed at anyone. Just talking. KJV Bible... most know about what's inside but it leads you to other complementing subjects. There's a Book of Judges inside. Every name is tribal. Some names lead you to other books. Monday you're reading the KJV Bible and come across Moses. Tuesdays you're reading the Torah. Wednesday your come across Mohammed/Muhammed the Prophet... Thursday you are reading the Quran. Jesus had predecessors. Most don't make these connections. Everyone reads about Lucifer and his fall and Stripping of his little title as Morning Star.... to Satan/Shaitan. Jesus is the Son/Sun of God. 🤔 Not really a big surprise there. God is in the details. 🤔You have to do the work. Some people don't realize they get brain washed. Some don't realize is a B.C. and the reason behind year 1. Some don't realize that real exorcist and demonologists have to work tirelessly. 📚 📚 📚 📚 🤔 You can tell a lot about a person by what they say. What they offer a guest to drink. Their actual knowledge of history. Even their temper. I piss off Catholics because they are brain washed. Then they realize there are things they don't know. Then it goes back to... they either didn't study themselves or they have been given misinformation. But I do know Catholics that are just getting it and realize what happened. I don't categorize because it's 🤔 moot to even try. 🤔 Studying Genesis took me to studying Hinduism and why the Naga & Gana's played a roll in history. Then you realize some people are from the other tower like LOTR's and that's actually what they believe. They don't realize Sauron is dead and he is not coming back. 🤔Or Vampires. Aluka is the first vampire ever in the Bible. Also in the Torah. Moving forward you pick names like Vlad Teppesh Drakula, Jure Grando, Lizzy the second. Why Elizabeth the second? (16TH great grand niece to Vlad Teppesh Drakula). Over legalities you have things like the John Jay Study Report. And why we have the lovely HR87-91. Japan B.C. Yokai.... 🤔 Call a Theologist a nerd if you want to. But I know librarians that kick ass. All about raising awareness and discerning misinformation. But you have to consider the sources. 🤔Cynocephali. My favorite subject. 1765-1776 Here's your freedom. So much history. Over 2000+ years after B.C. I had to take some of my studies in theology to other countries. 🗺 Tribes of all sorts. Men and Women in the creation stories. Some of the coolest people try and make sense of this stuff. It's surreal & hard core. 🤔 I do know who the bad guys are in history as do others. Then you realize some people depending where you fall... you might be related to them in some way or another. Some people don't have to do a genealogy or a DNA test. Good video man. 🤔 I hate vampires. I like Angels and Cynocephali. But I still have to study vampires. You know why... because you have nuts that dress like vampires and children that are found in the woods. You have things like missing 411. Park Rangers with a I saw something and 💩 my 👖 pants stories. You have government agents that have similar stories or the old "I think my boss is vampire" because he/she is a heartless SOB/DOB. I agree... Theology is everywhere. 🤔 And No, Jesus Christ wasn't a vampire and obviously some jackass would say that's what I was implying. Not at all. Jesus's heart didn't atrophy. Vampires by biology have no heart. Yes there is a science to it. Like Cynocephali, Wendigo's, Angels, Demons, 🤔 Nomads.

  • @thonahonkur1479
    @thonahonkur1479 Рік тому

    my pleasure to you, to have desire through you about theology of how to study the way of life in human dignity.

  • @sang2ii
    @sang2ii Рік тому

    You kinda look like Tom Holland and Tobey Maguire

  • @AndrianTimeswift
    @AndrianTimeswift Рік тому

    I'm finding myself completely lost trying to understand this. On this view, can God be wrong about something or do something wrong? Is there such a thing as divine foreknowledge on this view? How exactly does this relational view differ from a mechanistic one? Specifically, what does physics look like on Process Theology? Does Process Theology require Libertarian Free Will to work? How does Process Theology account for the instances in the Bible where God is clearly depicted exercising power and authority in an authoritarian way, such as during the plagues of Egypt? Also, I can quite easily imagine a world which contains only a single entity which is not in relation to any other entities. Even if that does not seem to be the world we inhabit, it seems perfectly coherent to me. I can also imagine a world which contains many entities, but these entities are so far apart that they have no ability to interact with one another at all, and can thus have no relation with one another. To each individual entity, it would be as though they were the only thing in existence. Again, nothing about this seems incoherent or even difficult to imagine.

    • @thelivingtribunal8494
      @thelivingtribunal8494 Рік тому

      >Specifically, what does physics look like on Process Theology? I can try to speculate on that: perhaps it would be a model like possibilism whereby the past exists, the present is becoming and the future is yet to be. Relating to the theology: As the world grows so does God, and ideally it would grow in a good direction.

    • @AndrianTimeswift
      @AndrianTimeswift Рік тому

      @@thelivingtribunal8494 Thank you for the response, but I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say. Let's try using a concrete example to get a feel for my confusion about the physics. Let's say I let go of an object at some height above the ground. On a mechanistic view, the object will fall at 9.8 m/s^2 toward the ground until it reaches its terminal velocity due to air resistance or impacts with something. Repeat this a million times, and the same thing happens every time. Does a relational model predict something different? As for your comment on the theology... I'm completely lost. What does it mean for the world to grow? What does it mean for God to grow? Is God the world? Is the world part of God? If the answer to both the previous questions is no, why does God grow with the world?

    • @thelivingtribunal8494
      @thelivingtribunal8494 Рік тому

      @@AndrianTimeswift Regarding physics, IDK how the macro world would relate to this: but looking at the micro, an ontology that is compatible with possibilism is objective collapse. In that case you can start with an initial state of something, say a particle and it could result in many possible outcomes, lets say 3 of them. If A has a probability of 50%, B has a probability of 30% and C has a probability of 20%, you will get some kind of result. Now if you could somehow repeat the experiment either in an identical setting or setting the thought experiment back to the beginning of it, and perform it again you will get another result but it need not be the same as the original one in an objective collapse ontology. Doing it again and again over an N number of times will give a tally of 0.5N A results, 0.3N B results and 0.2N C results. In this ontology, every single time it would be impossible to tell what would happen because the future would be indeterminate but no matter what, as long as it is repeated that often, the results will have the distribution as predicted by the wavefunction probability. On the macro world: the idea is that the collapsing probability densities result in the macroworld. Unlike the Copenhagen interpretation, this doesn't need a 'measurement' for collapse. So on the macro level I'd imagine its a bunch of probabilities of what can happen constantly collapsing into an outcome that just simply happens. *Note: I am not saying this is how the world actually is, but this is a proposition that works with possibilism model of physics which might work with process theology.* >As for your comment on the theology... I'm completely lost. What does it mean for the world to grow? What does it mean for God to grow? Is God the world? Is the world part of God? If the answer to both the previous questions is no, why does God grow with the world? The growth of the world/universe here would be the growth of the spacetime continuum from the past. Here the past would be things that have happened, which are real. But the future wouldn't be real because it is indeterminate (in contrast with a full B theory of time where the future is fixed and real). Growth for God would mean the world/universe to grow such that the outcomes are good. Now, what is good? My understanding of theology isn't developed enough to answer that but one could say harmony is good as an example. In particular the role of relations is interesting ( although I personally think that essence is foundational, not relations). In an objective collapse ontology/formalism the interaction of stable systems would result in the collapse of probability densities this can be seen as relations pushing this world forward in process theology. Still, I don't want to come across as being too certain, this is just me brainstorming how process theology can work with an example of a proposed physical ontology. Though it should be noted that objective collapse ontologies have an objective reality or an essence, meanwhile process theology is relational, so while it can carry attributes of process theology it doesn't have a relational ontology. If you want the ontology to be relational (instead of relegating relations to a mechanism) then you'd have to look elsewhere instead of objective collapse.

    • @AndrianTimeswift
      @AndrianTimeswift Рік тому

      @@thelivingtribunal8494 Okay, I think I get your drift. I don't really get how objective collapse is any more relational that a mechanistic model (or how it even doesn't count as mechanistic in and of itself), but I do get how someone could think so. Also, I'm surprised to see that your proposal for the ability for God/the universe to grow is in a very literal physical sense. I'm not clear on what the difference between good growth and bad growth would be (and if bad growth would even be a valid category) under the definition you've outlined, but I get that this isn't your own personal belief and it does seem rather complex.

    • @thelivingtribunal8494
      @thelivingtribunal8494 Рік тому

      @@AndrianTimeswift The relationality in objective collapse is important because without it, the wavefunction collapse would take much longer and as per the proposition, in that scenario (without interaction) our physical world wouldn't emerge like this. It isn't non-mechanistic, rather tries to link a classically mechanical world that we see with a quantum mechanics-like fundamental ontology. I am not sure what the good vs bad difference would be either since I don't have a mature understanding of the good. But you can take a proxy for what is good and that could be the good for sake of reference. The world could head in that direction or in one of many others. The key in this proposition is that the future of the world is open.

  • @timschlum1363
    @timschlum1363 Рік тому

    This is a heretical viewpoint and is a theology that is thoroughly unbiblical

  • @WakeRunSleep
    @WakeRunSleep Рік тому

    So basically process theology is pantheism

  • @amandagault3770
    @amandagault3770 Рік тому

    This is a great resource to use for studying!! Thanks for sharing!